The Polyglot's Playground ...and for Students of the Universe
Home About Contact FAQs Students Teachers Expats What's New?


Leon's Planet
on the web...
since 1997

Learn about the history of Leon's Planet.

Support Leon's Planet.
(This is a work of love, not commercial.  While there are advertisements on this website, they fail to generate the income needed to keep this work in progress).

Learn why.

Computerized-Adaptive Placement Exam for English, Spanish, French, German, Russian, Chinese, and ESL.  Used by over 400 universities in the USA and 600 institutions worldwide!
Click Here to learn more.
for this website

Paid ads

and free ads

Click here


Let's make this world a better place.

Click on one of the links below to see how you can make a difference in this world.


Internal Links

Leon's Planet...

Leon's Planet...

Leon's Planet

GET PAID to do it!" 


Leon's Blogs

Leon's Theory about
 the Origin of
and the Korean Language
© 2007-present, by Leon of Leon's Planet dot com

Included on this page are ancient creation myths from around the world.
If you want to skip all the stuff about the Koreans and go straight there, please click here.


Since June 23, 2013, you are visitor #:  


Please notice that this page has been up on the web since at least 2007 (probably longer), but the hit counter only started in June of 2013.  I have decided to add a hit counter to this page, because in the past two years this page has become extremely popular.  I have no idea why so many people are interested in the history/origins of the Korean people.  For me, it was just a matter of living in Korea for 10 years and developing an intellectual curiosity.  My research is a work in progress, but as of 2013, I believe I have finally solidified my own theory on the origins of the Korean people and their language.


Encyclopedia Britannica (Concise) has an article entitled "Korean Language" wherein one may read the following:

     "Korean is not closely related to any other language, though a distant genetic kinship to Japanese is now thought probable by some scholars, and an even more remote relationship to the Altaic languages is possible. Korean was written with Chinese characters to stand in various ways for Korean meanings and sounds as early as the 12th century, though substantial documentation is not evident until the invention of a unique phonetic script for it in 1443. This script, now called Hangul, represents syllables by arranging simple symbols for each phoneme into a square form like that of a Chinese character. Grammatically, Korean has a basic subject-object-verb word order and places modifiers before the elements they modify."

Note:  The origin of the Korean script is totally different from the origin of the spoken language.  See more here.

MAJOR PREMISE:  My premise for this page is that the analysis of the written histories of peoples of the Far East, analysis of the languages of the Far East, and analysis of the cultures of the Far East will provide some insight to the origins of the Korean people.

THE KOREANS THEMSELVES:  have an oral tradition that their ancestors came from Mongolia.  After 10 years of living in Korea (1995-2006), it was my deep desire to go to Mongolia in order to see for myself if there could be any truth in such a belief.  In 2010, that desire became a reality.  I lived in Mongolia for 5 years.  What I have found is that the Mongolian language does bear some similarities to the Korean language.  More detailed analysis below.  Physically, the Mongolians are much taller, but similar in girth.  Korean men are short and stocky.  Incidentally, I have also lived in Vietnam.  The people of Vietnam share many similarities with the Korean people.  For one, the Vietnamese are a smaller (shorter) people.  I have recently come to the conclusion that the Korean people are a hybrid of Mongols and Viets.  The evidence is laid out in the "tome" below.  Please enjoy!

My Other Korean-related pages:

My Expat Blog
  (Re: My 10-yr Life in Korea)

Korean Food Translated
  (fairly comprehensive list)

Korean Origins
This page!)

Konglish 1
  (Konglish Interlanguage)

Konglish 2
  (Konglish Lexis)

Konglish 3
  (Konglish Pronunciation)

Korean Dictionary Errors
  (quite the list)

Korean Language Lessons
(by Leon)


Table of Contents:


History of Korea ("unofficial" & "official")

II. 2 Theories (Northern and Southern)
III. My Conclusion (about the origin of the Korean people and their language)
IV. DNA Connection between Koreans & Mongolians

AND, possible linguistic links(Updated June 23, 2013)

V. Japanese-Korean-Mongolian Connection
VI. My Final Theory (about origin of Korean PEOPLE, and all humans)
VII. Creation Myths from various Ancient Cultures
VIII. Humans as genetic hybrids of E.T. and Terrestrial beasts



Very Brief History of Korea (And Vietnamese History)

Ancient Period

Foreword:  Most historians say that the Korean peninsula was inhabited by Paleo-Siberians until around 2333 BC, when they were forced out.  [I think this is non-sense, and I'll explain why later].  The "official" history of Korea begins at 2333 BC, with Dan-Gun, but I'm not going to start with the "official" history.  I'm going to start with the UNofficial history, which is considered to be apocryphal by mainstream historians.  [But, mainstream historians don't know everything, in my book].
The Dong Yi (East Barbarians)
[What Western academics call the PaleoSiberians and the Mongol Tribes]

7193 BC   Han-In establishes a country in what is now known as the Mongolian-Siberian territory, called Han-guk (The Han Country).

[Ah! So this is where the Koreans get there name "Han"!  And the connection between the Chinese "Han" and the Korean "Han" now becomes prefectly clear].

Han-guk  was comprised of twelve nations, also known as "DongYi" (Eastern Barbarians).
[I don't if the names of the twelve tribes are recorded anywhere, but I imagine that those 12 tribes included the Buryats, Mongols, Manchurians, Huns, Tibetans, Han-Chinese, Han-Koreans (possibly related to the Koryaks), also related to the ChukChi, etc.]

7193 BC - 3898 BC   Han-guk was ruled by seven in succession by seven Han-In's.
[Han-In was a title of a ruler, rather than a personal name].

Question:  If there were 12 tribes, and presumably each tribe had a leader (king?), then was Han-In the Emperor?  I don't know the answer to that question.]

Interesting Side Notes:

Koreans have lost the meaning of "Han" and today think that it just means the name of the people of "Han" (which was both the name of the land, and the title of the first kings).

Today, the Korean language is 70% from the Chinese language, called "Sino-Korean".  And the word for "king" is borrowed from Chinese:  Wang.  I have searched for decades to find the original Korean word for "king," and now I've found it!

After living in Mongolia for five years, where the word for king is "Haan," it became clear that the meaning of "Han" is king.

So, "Han-In" = King In,
      "Han-guk" = King's country
      "Han-ung" = King Ung,


This part (below) is also considered apocryphal by mainstream historians, but please compare the Vietnamese history!

Korean History

3898 BC: Establishment of Bak-dal Nara.
[Bak-dal is a possible cognate with Lake Baikal, the largest lake in the region and most voluminous lake in the world.]

3898 BC - 2333 BC   There were 18 Han-ungs, each ruling in succession of the other. (Han-ung was a title, not a name). The last Han-ung begot the first Dan-gun.


Vietnamese History

Vietnamese legend tells of a dragon lord named Lạc Long Quân and a mountain fairy named Âu Cơ who had 100 sons. As the parents belonged to different realms, they parted ways, each taking 50 of the 100 sons to their respective homes.
The eldest son of Lac Long Quan came to power in 2879 BC and became known as Hùng Vương, ruling an area covering what is now North Vietnam and part of southern China. He founded the Hồng Bàng Dynasty, which lasted until 258 BC.
Each successor of the original Hung Vuong took the title of Hung Vuong.  There were 18 Hung Vuongs in all.  (Source: Wikipedia)

To this day, in Hanoi City, two of the longest, main roads in the city are called, "Lac Long Quan" and "Au Co".  [I also lived in Vietnam].

Comment:  so they got the dates wrong, so what?  Korean: 18 Han-Ung; Vietnamese: 18 Hung-Vuong.

To me, the similar history suggests that there is a strong connection between the Korean people and the Vietnamese people.


The Koreans grow and use red-hot chili peppers in their Korean food, which peppers are NOT indigenous to the Korean peninsula.  Where did they get the peppers from?  I can assure you that they did NOT get them from Mongolia!  Mongolian food does NOT use chili peppers at all.  All the Korean restaurants in Mongolia dilute the spiciness of their food for the Mongolian palate.  They must have gotten the red chili peppers from South-East Asia, specifically Vietnam!  I know what you are thinking, it could just be the result of trade; however, trading means the mixing of languages, and sometimes (quite often) the mixing of blood.


This is where the official history begins (still called "ancient period")

2333 BC   Founding of old Jo-Seon (called Chao Xian in Chinese) by Dan Gun
Legend of Dan Gun: (source)

Hwan-In  (환인; 桓因, "Huan Yin," Eternal Causer),  the King of Heaven, was asked by one of his younger sons Hwan-Ung (환웅 ; 桓雄) to be sent down to earth to govern his own land.Taebaek-san 태백산; 太白山)  [Great White Mountain] as the best site,  opened heaven (Gae Cheon Jeol) and sent down his son to benefit humanity (hongik-ingan).

Hwan-Ung descended with three heavenly seals or treasures and 3000 followers, to a sacred sandalwood tree on the peak of Taebaek-san. Here he established a sacred city,
Shinshi,  (신시, 神市, 'city of the gods').  The noble spirits of Wind, Rain and Clouds were his ministers.  A government was established with 360 departments (interesting number!!!!) to rule with laws and moral codes about agriculture, grain-storage, hunting, fishing, sickness and medicine, education, the arts, family-life, etc.

A bear and a tiger both came to Hwan-Ung and prayed (begged) to become human beings.  The Heavenly Prince decided to give them a chance, and  gave them a bundle of mugwort (wormwood) and twenty bulbs of garlic and told them that if they ate only these sacred food and stayed in the cave (out of the sunlight) for one hundred days then they would become human.   

The tiger shortly gave up in impatient hunger and left the cave.  The bear remained and after 21 days was transformed into a woman.

The bear-woman, 
Ung-Nyeo (웅녀; 熊女)  was very grateful and made offerings to Hwan-Ung at the stone altar by the sacred sandalwood tree on the peak.  She had no husband, however, and prayed for a son.  Hwan-Ung was moved by her prayers to transform himself as a human man, and mated with her.  

Nine months later she gave birth to a son, who was named
Dan-Gun Wang-Geom.

Korean Chinese English
Eternal Causer
Eternal Male
Bear Woman
Sandalwood Monarch
King of moderation

 Thank-you, Google translate.

Dan-Gun founded the first Korean kingdom, with its capital nearby what is now Pyeong-Yang and then moved to Asadal, probably at Mt. Guwol-San in Hwang-Hae Province, and named it Joseon,  in the 50th year of the reign of the Emperor Yao (China’s mythical sage-emperor ).  Dan-gun reigned over Joseon (Now called "Go-Jo-Seon") for 1,500 years. [Leon's note:  There are some scholars who suggest that Dan-Gun was merely a title and that there were many Dan-Guns during that 1500-year period of time].

1122 BCE

At the end of the Dan-gun Dynasty, in the year 1122 BCE, we had the founding of King Wu San-Shin [a Mountain-spirit] at the age of 1,908

Side Note-1:

I lived on an Island, called Kang-Hwa-Do, near the DMZ, which has a mountain, the top of which bears an ancient monument and it is told by the islanders that Dan Gun actually hid out there long ago.  To this day, every October 3rd (Open-Heaven Day), the islanders climb to the top of the mountain, which takes shortly over an hour, and perform ancient rituals to commemorate the legendary founder of the JoSeon Kingdom.  ALSO, it must be noted that some scholars suggest that "Dan-Gun" may have actually been a title, and that their were more than one 'Dan-Gun' during the 1,908-year reign.]

Side Note-2:

Koreans were originally called "Jo-Seon Jeok" in the Korean language and "Chao Xian Jo" in the Chinese language.  The ethnic Koreans that live in China are still called "Chao Xian Jo" by the Chinese.  The word "Korea" comes from the "Goryeo" Dynasty which came later.  Incidentally, the English pronunciation of "Korea" is remarkably similar to the Korean pronunciation of "Goryeo".


1122 BC   Alleged arrival of Kija from Shang China (contentious)

c. 1000 BC   Start of bronze working in Liaodong peninsula (Ex. Pipa-like bronze daggers)

311 BC   Invasion of Qinkai of Yen, loss of 2000-li territory

194 BC   Wiman usurps the throne of Joseon's King Jun

108 BC   Invasion by Emperor Wudi of the [Chinese] Han Dynasty and establishment of the Four  Commandaries

82 BC    Commandaries Zhenfan and Lindun eliminated

75 BC    Xuantu commandary removed from peninsula



Another source gives some added information around this time period

It has been discovered in recent archeological excavations that the early race called Paleosiberians lived in the Korean peninsula and Manchuria before the Altaic race migrated to these areas. The PaleoSiberians, who include the Chukchi, Koryaks, Kamchadals, Ainu, Eskimos etc., were either driven away to the farther north by the newly arrived race or assimilated by the conquerors when they came to the Korean peninsula (which is partly what I, Leon, believe). It is believed that the migration of the new [Tungusic] race towards the Korean peninsula took place around 4000 BC. Nothing is known about the languages of the earliest settlers. After migration, some ancient Koreans settled down in the regions of Manchuria and northern Korea while others moved farther to the south. Many small tribal states were established in the general region of Manchuria and the Korean peninsula from the first century BC to the first century AD. The ancient Korean language is divided into two dialects: the Puyo language and the Han language. The Puyo language was spoken by the people of tribal states such as Puyo, Kokuryo, Okcho and Yemaek in Manchuria and northern Korean. The Han language was spoken by the people of the three Han tribal states of Muhan, Chinhan and Byonhan which were created in southern Korea. (source)

End Ancient Period.

  start... "Three-Kindoms Period":  From 75 BC to 676 AD

There were more than three kindgoms to begin with, like the ones mentioned above, but there was a lot of fighting, and war-mongering, and there were three kingdoms that dominated during this period: Shilla, Gogeuryeo, and Baekje. In the end (676 AD), Shilla dominates and unifies all.


Shilla Period: From 676 AD to 935 AD

Shilla ruled the whole peninsula.

Then, began the "Koryo" [old romanization] Period,

   or "Goryeo" [new romanization] Period,

   (which is where we get the name "Korea").



Two Theories (not mine)
on the origins of the Korean Language

By Nam-kil Kim

One day, I typed "Origin of Korean Language" in a search engine (Google), and this is what I found:


SOURCE: <article> by Nam-kil Kim.


For a long time scholars have tried to associate the Korean language to one of the major language families but have not been successful in this venture." There have been many theories about the origin of the Korean language, but two have been most popular: The Southern and Northern Theories.

Southern Theory PART 1 in a nutshell:

" was strongly advocated by the British scholar Homer B. Hulbert at the end of nineteenth century. Hulbert's argument was based on the syntactic similarities of Korean and the Dravidian languages. For instance, both languages have the same syntactic characteristics: the word order subject-object-verb, postpositions instead of prepositions, no relative pronouns, modifiers in front of the head noun, copula (BE VERB) and existential (EXIST VERB) as two distinct grammatical parts of speech etc."

Southern Theory PART 2 in a nutshell:

"The other version of the Southern theory is the view that Korean may be related to the Austronesian languages (which includes South-east Asia, like Vietnam). There are some linguistic as well as anthropological and archeological findings which may support this view. The linguistic features of Korean which are shared some Polynesian languages include the phonological structure of open syllables, the honorific system, numerals and the names of various body parts. The anthropological and archeological elements shared by Koreans and the people in other regions of the South Pacific are rice cultivation, tattooing, a matrilineal family system, the myth of an egg as the birth place of royalty and other recent discoveries in Paleolithic or pre-ceramic cultures."

Northern Theory in a nutshell:

"The Northern theory is the view that Korean is related to the Altaic family. The Northern theory stipulates that the Tungusic branch of Altaic tribesmen migrated towards the south and reached the Korean peninsula. The Tungusic languages would include two mayor languages: Korean and Manchu. Korean is similar to the Altaic languages with respect to the absence of grammatical elements such as numbers, genders, articles, fusional morphology, voice, relative pronouns and conjunctions. Vowel harmony and agglutination are also found in Korean as well as in the Altaic languages."

Kim, Nam-kil


Remember this?  Vietnam history supports the Southern Theory (but keep in mind that BOTH may be correct)....

Vietnamese legend tells of a dragon lord named Lạc Long Quân and a mountain fairy named Âu Cơ who had 100 sons. As the parents belonged to different realms, they parted ways, each taking 50 of the 100 sons to their respective homes.
The eldest son came to power in 2879 BC and became known as Hùng Vương, ruling an area covering what is now North Vietnam and part of southern China. He founded the Hồng Bàng Dynasty, which lasted until 258 BC.
Each successor of the original Hung Vuong took the title of Hung Vuong.  There were 18 Hung Vuongs in all.  (Source: Wikipedia)

Personally, I find this VERY interesting, because Korean history teaches something very similar.  According to "apocryphal" Korean history, from 3898 BC - 2333 BC There were eighteen Han-ungs, each ruling in succession of the other. (Han-ung was a title, not a name). The last Han-ung gave birth to the first Dan-gun.



My Conclusion (about origin of Korean People and the Korean Language)

I'm a thinker.  I ponder things that interest me a lot.  I try to figure things out.  And what makes sense to me after all the research that I've done, is that the Paleo-siberians (DongYi/Tungusic Tribes) never left the Korean peninsula (at least not all of them).  I can see why they think that some left, but not necessarily all of them.  If you look below, you will see that there is a very close genetic tie between the Tibetans, Siberians, Mongolians, Koreans and Japanese.  I agree with the idea that DongYi {i.e., Tungusic: (Siberian, Manchurian, Mongol)} tribes migrated down into the Korean peninsula, and Austronesians migrated from Vietnam, and there was a mixture of races (and languages).  I don't understand why it has to be one way or the other.  Why can't BOTH the Northern and Southern theories be true?


Koreans are in my estimation a combination of Tungusic (Mongolians) and Austronesian (Vietnamese) ethnicities.  Their language is a mixture of Mongolian grammar, Chinese and Vietnamese lexis.


MORE Information & MORE Evidence


DNA Connection?

Koreans claim that they are related to the Mongolians because all Koreans are born with a blue spot on their body (which goes away after a few years).  In fact, they call it the "Mongoli Jeom" (Mongolian Spot). 

This is a photo of my newborn son with is "Mongol Spot" or Mongolian blue birthmark.

(And he is only ½ Korean)

Unfortunately, the blue spot is a common thing all over Asia, so this is not enough evidence to claim a genetic link.

So, let's move on to the possibility of a linguistic link between to the two languages (and other languages of the region).

Linguistic Link?

Possible cognates will be highlighted in similar colors.

Category English Japanese Korean Manchu Mongolian Tibetan Vietnamese
Numbers one
yes (yus)
gcig (chiq)
gnyis (nyee)
gsum (soom)
bzhi (shi)
lnga (nga)
drug (druy)
bdun (dun)
brgyad (geh)
dgu (goo)
bcu (chu)


Interpolation (Leon's Note):  Amazingly, I see very little similarity in the numbering systems of the Far East!  I mean even most European languages will have similarities in the numbering systems.  By analyzing the numbers above, it would seem that the Manchu language was the "glue" of all the languages above.  Ironically, the Korean numbering system bears absolutely NO similarity with any other numbering systems of the region.  (Please note that I am fully aware that the Korean language has another numbering system which is based upon the Chinese numbering system, as does Japanese)See my Korean language page for more details.


Category English Japanese Korean Manchu Mongolian Tibetan Vietnamese
Family family shuzoku ga-jeok ? ger bul nang-mi gia dinh
Family mom haha omma eme ej ama la me
Family dad chichi abba ama avaa pala cha / bo
Family big sister ane eoni (f->f)
nuna (m->f)
? (The "official" and "formal" word is:  
egch); but Mongolians usually say:
"Anaa" or "Anee"
chengmo chi (gai)
Family big brother ani obba (f->m)
heong (m->m)
agee The "official" and "formal" word is: akh; but Mongolians usually say:
"Akhaa" or
chengpo anh (trai)
Family little sister imoutu dong saeng ? duu chungmo em gai
Family little brother otoutu dong saeng ? duu chungpo em trai 
Family grandma sobo halmoni ? emee* mola ba~
Family grandpa sohu haraboji ? oboo (eubeu) pola ong~
Family wife kanai
sek shi
sargan ekher, or
ger gii
(literally: home's light)
skyes dman vo
Family husband sujin
(literally: male side) or
uri egi abaa
(literally: my baby's dad)
? neukheur, or
avaa-li er
(literally: fatherly man)
khyo ga nguoi chong
Family daughter musume ddal ? okhin bu mo con gai
Family son musuko adeul ? khuu bu po con trai

* Interpolation:  I have wondered why the Mongolians changed "emee" from meaning 'mother' to 'grandma'; and after 3 years of living in Mongolia, I have concluded that it is because grandma does most of the child-raising, while 'mom' goes out and works.  I could be wrong, but it makes sense.

Note:  There could be other reasons, such as mothers dying during childbirth, or dying for other reason, and grandmothers taking on the role of "mother" for one reason or another.

Category English Japanese Korean Manchu Mongolian Tibetan Vietnamese
Body body mom beye biye
Body Parts head mori dalambi teolgeoi
Body Parts back heori horoo
Body Parts leg dari heul
Body Parts eye nun yasa nud
Body Parts nose ko hamar
Body Parts mouth ib am
Body Parts ear gui chikh
Category English Japanese Korean Manchu Mongolian Tibetan Vietnamese
Animals animal ikimono (from Chinese)
dong mul
? mal
sems can (from Chinese)
dong vat
Animals dog inu gae indahvn nokhoi khyi cho
Animals horse uma mal ? khor / adoo rta ngua
Animals sheep (from Chinese) yang kheoni
Animals cow so unee
Animals pig doeji gakhai
Animals goat yeom so yamaa ra
Animals chicken talk takhia
Animals tiger horangi bar
Category English Japanese Korean Manchu Mongolian Tibetan Vietnamese
Colors black keomeun (saek)
ggaman (saek)
heuk (saek)
yacin khar (unuk)
Colors brown gal (saek) bor (unuk)
Colors dark blue nam (saek) kheukh
Colors white hayan (saek) xanyan
tsagaan (unuk)
Colors violet / purple bora (saek) chirneliin yagaan
Colors true blue paran (saek) tsenkher (unuk)
Colors sky blue haneul (saek) tenger (unuk)
Colors green nog (saek) nogoon (unuk)
Colors yellow (from Chinese) hoang suwayan shar (unuk)
Colors orange (from Chinese) juhoang ubarshar (unuk)
Colors red bbalgan (saek) olaan (unuk)
Category English Japanese Korean Manchu Mongolian Tibetan Vietnamese
Environment sky ten haneul abka tenger gnam troi
Environment earth (land) riku ddang ba, na gazar sa cha dat
Environment air tei, tenkuu (from Chinese)  
kong gi
? agaar rlung (from Chinese)  
khong khi
Environment ocean / sea watatsumi (from Chinese) hae mederi tengis rgya mtsho bien
Environment gold (from Chinese) 
(from Chinese)
kim, keum
? altai, altan gser vang
Environment silver gin eun ? munk, mungun dngul bac
Environment rain ame, kouu bi aga boroo char pa mua
Category English Japanese Korean Manchu Mongolian Tibetan Vietnamese
Food water mizu, gogyou mul muke os chu nuoc
Food food sesshoku shik sa, eum shik xool (khol) kha lag do an
Food meat niku gogi max (makh) sha thit
Food dumpling mandu buuz  (/boze/)
Food roll roll mantu
Food rice beikoku
sal (uncooked)
bab (cooked)
bodaa bras lua
Category English Japanese Korean Manchu Mongolian Tibetan Vietnamese
People person saram niyalma khun
People male sut ~a~ er~
People female am ~e~ em~
People king kun / han

(from Chinese) wang

People man (from Chinese) namja haha er khun
People woman (from Chinese) yeoja hehe em khun
People friend chingu anda and, naiz
People teacher (from Chinese) gyo sa
& seon saeng
sefu baksh
People child ai juse khuukhed
Category English Japanese Korean Manchu Mongolian Tibetan Vietnamese
Verb be (copula) ida ? bol
Verb exist, have issda bi / bimbi bi, baikh
Verb love sarang-hada hairambi khairtai dga po
Verb do or make hada ? khiikh
Verb work il-hada weilembi ajilikh
Verb play nolda ? teokleokh
Verb eat meokda jembi idekh
Verb believe mid-da ? itgikh
Verb know alda ? medekh
Category English Japanese Korean Manchu Mongolian Tibetan Vietnamese
Subject Pronoun
(Nominative case)
I / we nae(ga) / uri(ga) bi / muse bi / bid
you / you all   tangshin / tangshideul si / suwe tanar
thou / ye ni(ga) / neohideul ? chi
one / they keu / keudeul i / ce ter
Direct Object Pronoun
(Accusative case)
me / us ni (ga) / uri (reul) mimbe / musebe namaik
you / you all tangshineul simbe / suwembe tanig
thee / ye neo (reul) chamaig
one / them keureul imbe / cembe tuuniig
Indirect Object Pronoun
(Dative case)
to me / for me na-hante
minde / musede nand
to you / for you tangshin-hante
sinde / suwende tand
to thee / for thee neo-hante
to/for  one/them keu-hante
inde / cende tund
Possessive Pronouns
(Genitive case)
my / our nae / uri mini / musei minii / manai
your tangshineui sini / suweni tanii
thy ni chinii
his/her/their keu ini /ceni tunii
Category English Japanese Korean Manchu Mongolian Tibetan Vietnamese
Life life itonami alm ? ami tshe doi song
Life name shougou ireum gebu ner ming ten
Life home/house honba jib boo, booi ger (yurt),
buunii zakh (market)
nang nha
Life good tame joh-eun sain sain yag po tot
Life bad warui nappeun ehe muu ngan pa xau
Life poop / manure baba ddong ? baas ? ?
Life pee / urine ? shi ? shees ? ?
Category English Japanese Korean Manchu Mongolian Tibetan Vietnamese
Cosmos Moon getsuei dal ? sar dawaa mat trang
Cosmos Sun taiyou / hi hae / nal (day) xun nara nyi ma mat troi
Cosmos Star kyohaku byeol ushiha od skar ma sao
Category English Japanese Korean Manchu Mongolian Tibetan Vietnamese
Interrogatives What muo, museun ai, aibade yu, yum
Interrogatives When onje fonde khizee
Interrogatives Where eodi aba khanaa
Interrogatives Why we aiman yagad
Interrogatives Who nugu we khen
Interrogatives How odogge absi, adarame yaj
Interrogatives How much
How many
myeot gae
? yamar
Conjunction When ~ddae sidende ~daa, dee, doo
Preposition to, toward ~ro ? ~ro
Note:  This comparative/contrastive glossary is a work in progress.  My sources include:

(1) My own knowledge of the English and Korean languages

(2) Bolor English-Mongolian--Mongolian-English Dictionary

(3) English-Japanese Dictionary

(4) English-Manchu Glossary

(5) English-Tibetan Dictionary

(6) English-Vietnamese Dictionary


So, you can see, that mostly there are no similarities in the lexis, and sometimes the word has actually changed meaning although my guess is that they are etymologically related.  Yes, occasionally, there are similarities, but I was shocked to find that none of the numbers and very few of the family words matched.  You see what I mean?  In conclusion, I'm convinced that their may have been an ancient linguistic connection, but traveling through China and mixing with other cultures has tainted the lexis.  70% of Korean is now from Chinese language.  I have avoided the Sino-Korean (above) whenever possible.  Little resemblance remains lexically to the mother Mongolian tongue, however the grammar is nearly identical, and the vowels are nearly identical.



The Japanese-Korean-Mongolian Connection

From my lexical analysis of the Japanese, Korean, and Mongolian languages, it appears that the Japanese language has a much closer connection to Mongolian.

Of course all three languages have EXACTLY the same grammar (same syntax; AND, all three have the same suffix-like particles), and all three have VERY similar phonological traits, such as rules regarding vowel harmony.

Yet, when I write "much closer", I simply mean that there are more words in Japanese which bear resemblance to Mongolian, but the connection is still a weak one.

The Korean-Japanese ties go way back.  It has been told me that the Koreans introduced the Chinese characters to the Japanese.  Whether this is true or not, is not known to me, but it seems very plausible, given the geographical situation (i.e., Korean being between China and Japan).  The Japanese language, like Korean has "borrowed" a heck of a lot of words from Chinese.  But, both the Korean language and Japanese languages have retained many of their "original" lexis as well.  It is of this "original" lexis that I write, when I write about the connection to the Mongolian language.

However, due to the fact that much of the "original" lexis has fallen out of use and has become lost over the centuries, it is really difficult for linguists to "classify" the two languages.

Because the syntax and phonological features are remarkably similar to Altaic languages, it is logical to include them in the Altaic language group.  However, due to lexical differences, it is difficult to place them in any specific language group.

Look at the following diagram to see what I mean:


One can see where I got the above information from, however, my language map is different (and superior, in my opinion, because it shows more clearly how languages "overlap").

Important Points to consider (refer to diagram above):

1.  The diagram shows how the Korean language has roots in the Tungusic Language group AND NOT THE MONGOLIAN language group.  Note:  Manchurian is part of the Tungusic language group, and Korean may have some roots from the Manchu language.

2.  The diagram shows how the Korean and Japanese languages have been heavily influenced by the Han-Chinese language.

3.  The diagram shows how the Japanese language has some roots in the Mongolian language group.  Hence, the lexis of "pure" Japanese is closer to Mongolian than that of the "pure" Korean.

4.  The diagram shows how the Korean language has been influenced by the Austronesian language group.

5.  It is not known (by me) whether the Japanese language has been influenced by the Austronesian language group or not.  Therefore, I have not extended the Japanese language into that "field".

6.  The funny thing is, according to genetic maps (on above SOURCE page), the Koreans and Japanese are more closely related to Tibetans than Mongolians. (see diagram below): 


But, look at this language pedigree chart:


All right, now!  There is something screwy going on here.  The Ainu, Siberians, Tibetans and Eskimos are all closely related genetically, yet the Tibetan language is in a totally different language group (not on chart above; see chart below).  If you examine the chart closely, you see that languages are grouped based upon their geographic location (i.e., the location of the people that speak them).  And yet, logic tells us that you cannot do that, simply because people move around a lot.  For example the Lapp people claim to have come from Tibet; And, I'll bet that there is not one single similarity between the "pure" Lapp language and the "pure" Finnish language.  The Samoyeds, likewise are genetically different from the Finnish people.  They look more like Eskimos.

Notice all the question marks in the chart above.  That is to say that most linguists aren't sure of the links, but some linguists go with it out of convenience, I'm sure.  I've read in a book about the Korean language (and heard as well) that the Korean language is linguistically related to the Finnish language.  I now see why such is reported, but my own studies of the two languages show no similarities, neither in lexis nor in grammar.

Japanese and Korean are often linked with Mongolian, because they all share exactly the same grammatical features.  They even share some phonological features.  Yet, my studies have shown NO lexical similarities between the Japanese language and the Korean language, and NO lexical similarities between the Mongolian language and the Korean language.  I HAVE, however, noticed similarities in lexis between the Japanese language and the Mongolian language.

Also, I have noticed some similarities between the Manchurian language, which is dying quickly, and the Korean language.  It is my goal to study, learn, and document the Manchurian language before it completely dies from the face of the earth.  If only somebody would finance the goal.

It should be noted that that the Tibeto-Burman language groups consists of roughly 250 languages, and the Chinese language group consists of countless dialects (if you could even call them dialects).  The Sino-Caucasian Language group is expanded to look like this (according to "linguists"):

But it is a joke to group the Han-Chinese language and Tibeto-Burman language group together, because they are not linguistically related.  It is also a joke to link the Basque language and Caucasian language group together, because they are not linguistically related either.  AND, it is an even bigger joke to link the Sino-Tibetan group with the Basque-Caucasian group, because you probably couldn't find a single linguistic similarity.  

For more information on the Basque language, see (and click on) the link below:

For more information on the Sino-Tibetan group, see (and click on) the link below:

For more information on the Tungusic language group, see (and click on) the link below:



However, there is a theory that some linguists have which I fancy, because it matches my own.  The following passage is from a web-article contained in the Sino-Tibetan Etymological Dictionary and Thesaurus (STEDT):

The Proto-Sino-Tibetan (PST) homeland seems to have been somewhere on the Himalayan plateau, where the great rivers of East and Southeast Asia (including the Yellow, Yangtze, Mekong, Brahmaputra, Salween, and Irrawaddy Rivers) have their source. The time of hypothetical ST unity, when the Proto-Han (= Proto-Chinese) and Proto-Tibeto-Burman (PTB) peoples formed a relatively undifferentiated linguistic community, must have been at least as remote as the Proto-Indo-European period, perhaps around 4000 B.C.

The TB peoples slowly fanned outward along these river valleys, but only in the middle of the first millennium A.D. did they penetrate into peninsular Southeast Asia, where speakers of Austronesian (= Malayo-Polynesian) and Mon-Khmer (Austroasiatic) languages had already established themselves by prehistoric times. The Tai peoples began filtering down from the north at about the same time as the TB's. The most recent arrivals to the area south of China have been the Hmong-Mien (Miao-Yao), most of whom still live in China itself.


This part below (namely, the Creation Myths Part) has moved to my Creation Myths Page.

You may go there now by clicking  below.

Creation Myths Page

RE: creation of humans


Your ad here



Your ad here



Your ad here



Your ad here




Leon's Planet dot com (an educational website)  © 1997 to present time.  Contact Webmaster

P.S.  I love you guys!